Categories: Texas Court Opinions

CREDIGY RECEIVABLES v. JONES, 05-06-00586-CV (Tex.App.-Dallas 6-27-2006)

CREDIGY RECEIVABLES, INC., Appellant, v. FRED C. JONES, IV, Appellee.

No. 05-06-00586-CVCourt of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, Dallas.
Opinion Filed June 27, 2006.

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. 05-12639.

Dismiss.

Before Justices WRIGHT, MOSELEY, and LANG.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM.

The Court has before it appellee Fred C. Jones, IV’s May 15, 2006 motion to dismiss appeal. In his motion, appellee asserts that appellant Credigy Receivables, Inc. filed its April 21, 2006 notice of appeal late. Appellant did not respond to the motion.

Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal was due by April 13, 2006, thirty days after the trial court signed the March 14, 2006 judgment. Rule 26.3 provides an additional fifteen-day window in which appellant may file a notice of appeal and a motion for extension of time in the appellate court. Because appellant filed his notice of appeal within the fifteen-day period provided by rule 26.3, this Court may consider appellant’s notice of appeal as an implied motion for extension of time to file notice of appeal. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). We still, however, require appellant to file a motion for extension of time in compliance with rule 26.3(b). Accordingly, we sent appellant a letter dated May 26, 2006 directing it to file a motion for extension of time in compliance with rule 26.3(b). To date, appellant has not responded to our letter or otherwise communicated with this Court.

Because appellant’s April 21, 2006 notice of appeal is untimely, we do not have jurisdiction over the appeal. We GRANT appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal.

We DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(a).

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

INWOOD NAT’L BANK v. FAGIN, 706 S.W.3d 342 (2025)

706 S.W.3d 342 (2025) INWOOD NATIONAL BANK and Inwood Bancshares, Inc., Petitioners, v. D. Kyle…

6 days ago

IN RE GEN. SERVS., L.P., ___ S.W.3d ___ (2025)

Supreme Court of Texas ___________________ No. 24-0024 ___________________ In re UMTH General Services, L.P., UMT…

6 days ago

VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT v. MECK, 620 S.W.3d 356 (2020)

620 S.W.3d 356 (2020) VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT, Petitioner, v. Curtis MECK, Respondent. No. 18-0458.Supreme Court…

4 years ago

Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0150

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS May 31, 2017 Opinion No. KP-0150 Re: Whether municipal…

8 years ago

IND. FOUNDATION, ETC. v. TEXAS IND. ACC. BD., 540 S.W.2d 668 (1976)

540 S.W.2d 668 (1976) INDUSTRIAL FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTH, Petitioner, v. TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BOARD…

8 years ago

Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0149

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS May 18, 2017 Opinion No. KP-0149 Re: Whether individuals civilly committed?pursuant…

9 years ago