Categories: Texas Court Opinions

NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION v. ADRIAN ASSOCIATES, 650 S.W.2d 67 (Tex. 1983)

650 S.W.2d 67

NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ADRIAN ASSOCIATES, General Contractors, Respondent.

No. C-1581.Supreme Court of Texas.
May 11, 1983.

Appeal from the Dallas Court of Civil Appeals, Fifth Supreme Judicial District; Whitham, J.

Appeal from District Court No. 68, Dallas County; Giles, Judge.

Craig A. Eggleston, Dallas, for petitioner.

Canterbury Elder, W. Kyle Gooch, Dallas, for respondent.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.

This case involves exclusions in a builder’s “all risk” insurance policy. The trial court granted summary judgment for the defendant insurance company, finding no coverage under the policy. The court of appeals reversed and remanded the case for trial. 638 S.W.2d 138.

Because the holding of the court of appeals is in conflict with that in Park v. Hanover Insurance Company, 443 S.W.2d 940
(Tex.Civ.App. — Amarillo 1969, no writ), we express our approval of the holding in the instant case under the provisions of Rule 483, Tex.R.Civ.P.[1]

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

[1] Rule 483 provides in part:

In cases of conflict named in subdivision 2 of Art. 1728 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, as amended, the Supreme Court shall grant the application for writ of error, unless it be in agreement with the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals in the case wherein the application is filed, in which event said Supreme Court shall so state in its order, with such explanatory remarks as may be deemed appropriate.

ROBERTSON, J., not sitting.

Page 68

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

INWOOD NAT’L BANK v. FAGIN, 706 S.W.3d 342 (2025)

706 S.W.3d 342 (2025) INWOOD NATIONAL BANK and Inwood Bancshares, Inc., Petitioners, v. D. Kyle…

1 week ago

IN RE GEN. SERVS., L.P., ___ S.W.3d ___ (2025)

Supreme Court of Texas ___________________ No. 24-0024 ___________________ In re UMTH General Services, L.P., UMT…

1 week ago

VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT v. MECK, 620 S.W.3d 356 (2020)

620 S.W.3d 356 (2020) VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT, Petitioner, v. Curtis MECK, Respondent. No. 18-0458.Supreme Court…

4 years ago

Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0150

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS May 31, 2017 Opinion No. KP-0150 Re: Whether municipal…

8 years ago

IND. FOUNDATION, ETC. v. TEXAS IND. ACC. BD., 540 S.W.2d 668 (1976)

540 S.W.2d 668 (1976) INDUSTRIAL FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTH, Petitioner, v. TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BOARD…

8 years ago

Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0149

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS May 18, 2017 Opinion No. KP-0149 Re: Whether individuals civilly committed?pursuant…

9 years ago