Attorney General of Texas — Opinion.
October 10, 1991
DAN MORALES, Attorney General of Texas
Honorable Ernestine V. Glossbrenner Chairman Public Education Committee Texas House of Representatives P. O. Box 2910 Austin, Texas 78768-2910
Re: Whether school districts have the authority to pay school employees for accrued sick leave (RQ-147)
Dear Representative Glossbrenner:
You have requested an opinion regarding the authority of school districts to pay their employees accrued sick leave. Specifically, you ask whether, in light of recent legislation, school districts that have adopted a policy to pay employees for accrued sick leave continue to have the authority to do so. You also ask whether school districts that have not yet adopted such a policy would be prohibited from adopting one in the future.
Your query arises as a result of House Bill 2885, a measure that deals primarily with school finance, passed by the 72nd Legislature in June 1991. See Acts 1991, 72d Leg., ch. 391, at 1475. Section 68 of House Bill 2885 amended section 13.904 of the Education Code, which formerly required school districts to provide teachers with five days of sick leave per year. Prior to the amendment, section 13.904(a) provided that “[a] state minimum sick leave program consisting of five days per year sick leave with no limit on accumulation . . . shall be provided for every teacher regularly employed in the public free schools of Texas.” (Emphasis added.) House Bill 2885 amended section 13.904 of the Education Code to extend the requirement that school districts provide five paid sick leave days to all school district employees: “A state minimum sick leave program consisting of five days per year sick leave with no limit on accumulation . . . shall be provided for every person regularly employed in the public free schools of Texas.” Acts 1991, 72d Leg., ch. 391, section 68, at 1502 (emphasis added).
In addition, section 69 of House Bill 2885 repealed section 21.919 of the Education Code, which authorized school districts to pay accrued sick leave to any non-teacher employee to whom the school district provided sick leave benefits:
If a school district provides sick leave for an employee not covered under Section 13.904 of this code, the school district may pay the employee for accrued sick leave when the employee leaves the employment of the district.
Apparently, some school districts contend that as the result of the repeal of section 21.919, they are no longer authorized to pay accrued sick leave to any of their employees. Clearly, however, House Bill 2885 repealed section 21.919 as unnecessary surplusage since under the new law there are no employees who are not covered under section 13.904. We conclude that House Bill 2885 does not affect school districts’ authority to pay accrued sick leave to their employees.
You also ask us to consider whether the Education Code otherwise authorizes school districts to pay school employees for accrued sick leave. We conclude that it does. The trustees of an independent school district have those powers expressly conferred upon them by law or necessarily implied from express powers. Harlingen Indep. School Dist. v. C H. Page Bros., 48 S.W.2d 983, 986 (Tex. Comm’n App. 1932, judgmn’t adopted); Attorney General Opinion JM-1000 (1988) at 4-5. Section 23.26(b) of the Education Code gives the trustees of a school district the exclusive power to manage and govern the schools of the district. Section 23.28 of the Education Code authorizes a board of trustees to employ teachers and certain other personnel. Although sections 16.055 and 16.056 of the Education Code set forth a minimum monthly salary base for teachers and certain other personnel, the board of trustees of an independent school district has the discretionary power to exceed this minimum. See Educ. Code section 16.057(b); Attorney General Opinion M-493 (1967) (construing predecessor statute). Clearly, the Education Code authorizes a board of trustees to hire employees and to set the terms and conditions of their employment, including their benefits and compensation. We believe these provisions confer upon boards of trustees the implied power to adopt policies allowing payment for unused sick leave. Cf. Attorney General Opinion H-797 (1976) (holding that commissioners court had implied statutory authority to pay accrued sick leave).
In addition, section 20.48(c) of the Education Code authorizes school districts to expend local school funds from district taxes for several specific, enumerated purposes and “for other purposes necessary in the conduct of the public schools to be determined by the board of trustees.” This section gives trustees of a school district broad discretion to expend local school funds. See Attorney General Opinions JM-490 (1986) at 2; H-133 (1973) at 4 (both holding that the determination of whether expenditure is necessary under section 20.48(c) is a matter for the discretion of school boards). In our opinion, section 20.48(c) authorizes boards of trustees to expend school funds to pay employees accrued sick leave if they determine that such a policy is necessary to the conduct of the school district. In sum, we conclude that school districts were authorized to adopt policies allowing payment for unused sick leave in the past,
and continue to have such authority following the passage of House Bill 2885.
School districts have the implied authority under sections 20.48(c), 23.26(b), and 23.28 of the Education Code to adopt policies to pay their employees for accrued sick leave, and continue to have such authority following the repeal of section 21.919 of the Education Code.
Very truly yours,
DAN MORALES Attorney General of Texas
WILL PRYOR First Assistant Attorney General
MARY KELLER Executive Assistant Attorney General
JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY (Ret.) Special Assistant Attorney General
RENEA HICKS Special Assistant Attorney General
MADELEINE B. JOHNSON Chair, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Mary R. Crouter Assistant Attorney General