Thomas H. Haynie

Attorney General of Texas — Opinion.
September 1, 1978

JOHN L. HILL, Attorney General of Texas

Honorable Thomas H. Haynie Chairman Texas Private Employment Agency Regulatory Board Sam Houston State Office Building Austin, Texas

Re: Whether an advance fee resume service is a private employment agency under article 5221a-6, V.T.C.S.

Dear Mr. Haynie:

You have requested our opinion as to whether an advance fee resume service is a private employment agency under article 5221a-6, V.T.C.S.

You state that a company commonly referred to as an `advance fee resume service’ furnishes to individuals seeking employment `a prepared resume and a list or pre-addressed mailing labels of potential employers.’ The resume service charges a flat fee for its service, payable in advance. The names of prospective employers are ordinarily obtained from trade journals and governmental sources, and there is no direct contact between the resume service and the prospective employer on behalf of a particular employee or with respect to a particular job opening. The resume service frequently advertises its services through the broadcast and print media, with a specific disclaimer that it is a private employment agency.

A `private employment agency’ is defined by statute as

any person, place or establishment within this state who for a fee or without a fee offers or attempts, either directly or indirectly, to procure employment for employees or procures or attempts to procure employees for employers, except as hereinafter exempted from the provisions hereof.

V.T.C.S. art. 5521a-6, § 1(e) (emphasis added). On the basis of the description you have furnished us, we believe it is clear that an advance fee resume service is not within the definition of a `private employment agency,’ for the reason that it neither `offers . . . to procure employment for employees’ nor `procures or attempts to procure employees for employers.’ See Miller v. Eldridge, 286 S.W. 999 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1926, writ dism’d).

In the situation you describe, an advance fee resume service does not contact an employer on behalf of a prospective employee. Nor does it locate prospective employees for employers, as does a `management search consultant’ under section 1(b) of the statute. See Attorney General Opinion H-699 (1975). We do not believe that the regulatory scope of article 5221a-6 may ordinarily be extended to include those entities which maintain contact with only the prospective employee. Since there is no direct contact between the resume service and the employer or his agent, we believe Texas courts would hold that the service is not a `private employment agency’ for purposes of article 5221a-6.

SUMMARY
Where there is no direct contact between the resume service and a prospective employer or his agent, an advance fee resume service, as described, is not a `private employment agency’ for purposes of article 5221a-6, V.T.C.S.

Very truly yours,

John L. Hill Attorney General of Texas

APPROVED:

David M. Kendall First Assistant

C. Robert Heath Chairman Opinion Committee

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: H-1236

Recent Posts

INWOOD NAT’L BANK v. FAGIN, 706 S.W.3d 342 (2025)

706 S.W.3d 342 (2025) INWOOD NATIONAL BANK and Inwood Bancshares, Inc., Petitioners, v. D. Kyle…

2 weeks ago

IN RE GEN. SERVS., L.P., ___ S.W.3d ___ (2025)

Supreme Court of Texas ___________________ No. 24-0024 ___________________ In re UMTH General Services, L.P., UMT…

2 weeks ago

VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT v. MECK, 620 S.W.3d 356 (2020)

620 S.W.3d 356 (2020) VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT, Petitioner, v. Curtis MECK, Respondent. No. 18-0458.Supreme Court…

4 years ago

Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0150

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS May 31, 2017 Opinion No. KP-0150 Re: Whether municipal…

8 years ago

IND. FOUNDATION, ETC. v. TEXAS IND. ACC. BD., 540 S.W.2d 668 (1976)

540 S.W.2d 668 (1976) INDUSTRIAL FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTH, Petitioner, v. TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BOARD…

8 years ago

Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0149

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS May 18, 2017 Opinion No. KP-0149 Re: Whether individuals civilly committed?pursuant…

9 years ago