Hal H. Hood

Attorney General of Texas — Opinion.
December 28, 1979

MARK WHITE, Attorney General of Texas

Honorable Hal H. Hood Firemen’s Pension Commissioner 503-F Sam Houston State Office Bldg. Austin, Texas 78701

Re: Eligibility for membership in the Pension Fund of a person who has reached his 35th birthday, but has not reached his 36th birthday.

Dear Commissioner Hood:

You have asked our opinion in construing article 6243e, section 10A-3(i) which provides that no person is eligible for membership in the city Fireman’s Relief and Retirement Fund if he is more than thirty-five (35) years of age at the time he first enters service as a fireman. The question presented is whether a person who is subject to this statute is `more than thirty-five (35) years of age’ the day after his 35th birthday or not until he becomes thirty-six (36) years of age.

In construing this statute, we feel it significant that under article 1269m, section 9, dealing with fireman’s civil service, the requirement is made that no person is eligible for a beginning position with a Fire Department who has reached his thirty-sixth (36th) birthday.

While it is arguable that an individual is more than thirty-five (35) years of age the day after his 35th birthday, the requirements of the civil service law suggest that what the legislature intended by the phrase `more than thirty-five (35) years of age’ in article 6243e, section 10A-3(i) is age thirty-six rather than thirty-five years and one day.

SUMMARY
For the purposes of article 6243e, section 10A-3(i), a person is not more than thirty-five (35) years of age until he reaches his thirty-sixth (36th) birthday.

Very truly yours,

Mark White Attorney General of Texas
John W. Fainter, Jr. First Assistant Attorney General
Ted L. Hartley Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by Eva King Loutzenhiser Assistant Attorney General

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: MW-119

Recent Posts

INWOOD NAT’L BANK v. FAGIN, 706 S.W.3d 342 (2025)

706 S.W.3d 342 (2025) INWOOD NATIONAL BANK and Inwood Bancshares, Inc., Petitioners, v. D. Kyle…

2 weeks ago

IN RE GEN. SERVS., L.P., ___ S.W.3d ___ (2025)

Supreme Court of Texas ___________________ No. 24-0024 ___________________ In re UMTH General Services, L.P., UMT…

2 weeks ago

VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT v. MECK, 620 S.W.3d 356 (2020)

620 S.W.3d 356 (2020) VIA METROPOLITAN TRANSIT, Petitioner, v. Curtis MECK, Respondent. No. 18-0458.Supreme Court…

4 years ago

Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0150

KEN PAXTON ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS May 31, 2017 Opinion No. KP-0150 Re: Whether municipal…

8 years ago

IND. FOUNDATION, ETC. v. TEXAS IND. ACC. BD., 540 S.W.2d 668 (1976)

540 S.W.2d 668 (1976) INDUSTRIAL FOUNDATION OF THE SOUTH, Petitioner, v. TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BOARD…

8 years ago

Texas Attorney General Opinion No. KP-0149

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS May 18, 2017 Opinion No. KP-0149 Re: Whether individuals civilly committed?pursuant…

9 years ago