Opinion No. MW-436


Mike Driscoll

Attorney General of Texas — Opinion.
February 1, 1982

MARK WHITE, Attorney General of Texas

Honorable Mike Driscoll Harris County Attorney 1001 Preston, Suite 634 Houston, Texas 77002

Re: Constitutionality of section 11.23(a) of the Property Tax Code

Dear Mr. Driscoll:

You have requested our opinion regarding the constitutionality of section 11.23(a) of the Property Tax Code. This provision states as follows:

(a) Veterans’ Organizations. The American Legion, American Veterans of World War II, Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States, Disabled American Veterans, Jewish War Veterans, Catholic War Veterans, or the American G.I. Forum is entitled to an exemption from taxation of the buildings (including the land that is reasonably necessary for use of, access to, and ornamentation of the buildings) that are owned and primarily used by that organization if the property is not used to produce revenue or held for gain.

Section 11.23(a) of the Property Tax Code thus seeks to exempt from ad valorem tax the buildings owned and used by veterans’ organizations.

Property may be exempted from ad valorem taxation only if it is exempted by a constitutional provision or a statute adopted pursuant to article VIII, section 2 of the Texas Constitution. River Oaks Garden Club v. City of Houston, 370 S.W.2d 851 (Tex. 1963). See also City of Beaumont v. Fertitta, 415 S.W.2d 902 (Tex. 1967); Santa Rosa Infirmary v. City of San Antonio, 259 S.W. 926
(Tex. Comm’n App. 1924); City of Houston v. Scottish Rite Benevolent Assn., 230 S.W. 978 (Tex. 1921); Morris v. Lone Star Chapter No. 6, Royal Arch Masons, 5 S.W. 519
(Tex. 1887). The legislature is without power to add to the list of properties entitled to exemption by article VIII, section 2 of the Texas Constitution, and any attempt to do so is void. City of Amarillo v. Amarillo Lodge No. 731, A.F. and A.M., 488 S.W.2d 69 (Tex. 1972); Leander Independent School District v. Cedar Park Water Supply Corp., 479 S.W.2d 908 (Tex. 1972); City of Amarillo v. Love, 356 S.W.2d 325 (Tex.Civ.App.-Amarillo 1962, writ ref’d n.r.e.); Dickison v. Woodmen of the World Life Insurance Society, 280 S.W.2d 315
(Tex.Civ.App.-San Antonio 1955, writ ref’d). Property not exempt from taxation pursuant to a constitutional provision must be taxed. Tex. Const. art. VIII, § 1.

Article VIII, section 2 of the Texas Constitution provides in pertinent part:

. . . the legislature may, by general laws, exempt from taxation public property used for public purposes; actual places of religious worship, . . . places of burial not held for private or corporate profit; solar or wind- powered energy devices; all buildings used exclusively and owned by persons or associations of persons for school purposes . . ., and institutions of purely public charity; and all laws exempting property from taxation other than the property mentioned in this Section shall be null and void. (Emphasis added).

Manifestly, there is no authorization in the constitution for the legislature to exempt from ad valorem taxation real property merely because it is owned and used primarily by veterans’ organizations. See State v. American Legion Post No. 58, 611 S.W.2d 720
(Tex.Civ.App.-El Paso 1981, no writ). We therefore conclude that section 11.23(a) of the Property Tax Code violates article VIII, sections 1 and 2 of the Texas Constitution. We do not consider whether real property owned by a veterans’ organization might be exempt under some other valid provision.

SUMMARY
Section 11.23(a) of the Property Tax Code exempting from ad valorem taxation real property merely because it is owned and used primarily by veterans’ organizations is unconstitutional.

Very truly yours,

Mark White Attorney General of Texas
John W. Fainter, Jr. First Assistant Attorney General
Richard E. Gray III Executive Assistant Attorney General
Jim Moellinger Assistant Attorney General