Joe Resweber

Attorney General of Texas — Opinion.
December 12, 1979

MARK WHITE, Attorney General of Texas

Honorable Joe Resweber Harris County Attorney 1001 Preston, Suite 634 Houston, Texas 77002

Re: Disposition of surpluses in interest and sinking fund for Harris County Hospital Bonds, Series 1950, after all principal of and interest thereon has been paid.

Dear Mr. Resweber:

Your request for an opinion poses the following question:

After the payment of the principal of, and all interest on, the entire issue of $1,500,000 Harris County Hospital Bonds, Series 1950, can the surplus in the Interest and Sinking Found created for the payment of, and interest, on said bond issue, be expended for other purposes?

You also wish to know how the surplus may be used.

The Harris County Hospital District was created pursuant to article IX, section 4, of the Texas Constitution, and article 4494n, V.T.C.S. The subject bonds were issued pursuant to Chapters 1 and 2 of Title 22 and Chapter 5 of Title 71, Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, 1925, as amended. Chapter 5 of Title 71 included the following provision in section 1 (now codified, as amended, as article 4478, V.T.C.S.):

To issue county bonds to provide funds for the establishing, enlarging and equipping of said hospital and for all other necessary permanent improvements in connection therewith.

Acts 1913, 33rd Leg., ch. 39, at 72. (Emphasis added).

Chapter 2 of Title 22 in article 723, V.T.C.S., authorizes the use of surplus interest and sinking funds from courthouse, jail, road and bridge bonds for maintenance and repair of those improvements, within the discretion of the commissioners court. Chapter 3 of Title 22 contains an express provision in article 752a, V.T.C.S., which authorizes surplus interest and sinking funds from Chapter 3 road bonds to be used for further road work within the discretion of the commissioners court. There is no comparable statutory authority for disposition of surplus interest and sinking funds in Chapter 1 or 2 of Title 22 which would appear to be applicable. Furthermore, it appears that the Texas courts have not written as to this issue.

The general rule appears to be that surplus interest and sinking funds may be expended for the same `public improvements’ for which the bonds were originally issued. McQuillan, Municipal Corporations summarizes in Volume 15, § 43.134 as follows:

A sinking found should be applied to the payment of the principal and interest on the bonds which it was created to service, and even though the bonds have been declared void, cannot be diverted to other purposes. Thus, it is an unlawful diversion to transfer a sinking fund to the general fund. . . . It has been held that an unallocated surplus remaining after the payment of principal and interest of outstanding bonds may be used for the construction of a public improvement. . . .

It is settled law that moneys in a sinking fund may be used for no other purpose than the one for which it was created. Bexar County Hospital District v. Crosby, 327 S.W.2d 445 (Tex. 1959). See Attorney General Opinion H-658 (1975).

Therefore, although the authorizing statutes for this issue of bonds are silent to the disposition of surplus interest and sinking fund balances, the prevalent judicial and legislative reasoning appears to be that such surplus balances may only be used for the purposes for which the bonds were originally issued.

SUMMARY
The Interest and Redemption fund balance for the retired $1,500,000 Harris County Hospital Bonds, Series 1950, may be expended by the district for any lawful purpose relating to the establishing, enlarging, and equipping of said hospital, and for all other necessary permanent improvements.

Very truly yours,

Mark White Attorney General of Texas
John W. Fainter, Jr. First Assistant Attorney General
Ted L. Hartley Executive Assistant Attorney General
Prepared by D. Ladd Pattillo Assistant Attorney General