ZMESKAL v. STATE, 13-09-00367-CR (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 3-4-2010)


TAMRA ZMESKAL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

No. 13-09-00367-CRCourt of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi — Edinburg.
Opinion delivered and filed March 4, 2010. DO NOT PUBLISH. SEE TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

On Appeal from the 28th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices YAÑez and VELA.

Memorandum Opinion PER CURIAM.

MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Tamra Zmeskal, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion to dismiss her appeal because she no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.